30 April - Response to claims in the media re LPT and Biometric Reporting

The suggestion that London Probation Trust is looking to replace face-to-face contact by the use of new technology is incorrect.

For clarity, there is no possibility that the use of biometric technology will replace our statutory responsibility to provide face-to-face meetings with offenders.

London Probation Trust is commencing a research project which will explore the potential use of biometric technology within probation.

The project will look at the use of biometric machines to establish whether this provides probation staff with the flexibility to spend more time with offenders who are of a higher-risk or need more in-depth support.

Offenders involved in the research will continue to receive an appropriate level of face-to-face contact as per licence conditions.

Operational staff and offender representatives have been part of the project board overseeing this project; Union representatives have been regularly consulted. As part of the research, we will be looking at a number of issues including compliance, diversity and accessibility concerns which have already been raised in discussions with staff and stakeholders.

London Probation Trust is conscious of the need to improve frontline probation work. We are recruiting more Probation Officers and more money than ever in the frontline. This research project is designed to find ways of increasing the amount of face-to-face time spent with those who need most support and better use of Probation Officers’ time in appointments.

The project will be led and undertaken by independent researchers. It is expected to run for up to a year, enabling evidence-based conclusions to be reached on the impact of biometric technology before any decisions are taken about its use within the Trust.

Heather Munro, Chief Executive of London Probation Trust said:

“London Probation Trust intends to research biometric reporting of offenders to support our key aims of protecting the public and reducing reoffending.  

“We believe reducing the bureaucracy Probation Officers have to deal with, in order to increase the time spent in face-to-face meetings, is an important step.

“We are looking at various ways of doing this, from increasing the number of Probation Officers to investigating the use of technology to improve our ability to monitor offenders; we want to use the time of professional practitioners where it is most needed. ”